What We Feel Is Hard to Hide: Micro-Expressions Reveal What We Don’t Say

Our own lived experience informs us about how complex effective communication can be. That inadvertent misunderstandings do happen.  That we can be spoken to in a way that feels uncomfortable, even unsafe, on the receiving side, and at the same time, be unsure if we are right about what we are making of it. 

Words can be said in a hundred different ways.

Ask an actor. One of my most distinct memories from high school was the first day in drama class. The teacher had us each get up on the stage and say “Hello” in a way that conveyed a different emotion from those before us. Using just one word, some thirty students figured out how to shift their body language and tone of voice to convey feelings like happiness, fear, anger, sadness, hesitation, jealousy, surprise and disgust.

That experience has stayed with me for years. It was a powerful lesson about all the ways that we communicate, and how our inner experience – what we are thinking and feeling – comes through.

The seminal work of Paul Ekman shed so much light on this topic.  Dr. Ekman’s research revealed a group of facial microexpressions that are “universal”. Meaning no matter what culture you come from – Texas or New Guinea – the microexpressions that convey sadness, surprise, or disgust are understood. That doesn’t mean we know why they are sad, but we read “sad”.

Not all microexpressions are universal. Some have a cultural influence. These differences can complicate understanding, for instance, when people in a conversation are from different cultures. That situation of cultural diversity often exists in healthcare settings, and in many workplaces. It’s another filter through which we interpret a communication. 

A nurse manager asks a morning shift nurse, “Why wasn’t that done on the night shift?”

Looking at the words alone, it’s a straightforward question. But that’s not all that will play into how the words come across. Or how they are filtered by the listener. The context may not be known.

What is this nurse manager feeling right now?. What thoughts is she having, with the still smoldering upset at home before she got to work, and the deadline she is facing while being short staffed? How is that context impacting her nonverbal communication, if at all?

Our feelings, our thoughts, our past experiences – they all play into what becomes the tone, the body language and subtle facial cues that make up just how those eight words come across.  

The same words can be conveyed in a hundred different ways. Facial expressions, vocal tone, gestures, pauses, and changes in posture all contribute to how a message is received. These cues can reveal thoughts and emotional states that a person may not intend, or may not yet be able, to express directly. 

We may not be able to control the external stressor around us, but in the moment, we can more flexibly observe, assess and change our own stress responses. This is a distinct set of skills in cultivating psychological flexibility that can be readily learned and put into practice.

It’s been eye-opening to me over many years working in conflict resolution and stress response training, in medical settings, to observe how these competencies, in navigating stress and our own stress response, are so powerful and helpful in health, safety, and interpersonal relationships.

And according to the data we are seeing, they are competencies that participants are learning and reporting to be valuable to them personally, and in providing good care to their patients.

Just published, a research paper on the StressPal Frontline program’s positive outcomes with healthcare professionals participating in our self-paced digital intervention to train cognitive defusion skills of psychological flexibility.

Authored by Pennie Sempell, J.D, Co-founder and co-author of StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Intervention, an innovative professional development intervention specifically developed for healthcare and allied frontline workers.

© 2026 StressPal Inc. All rights reserved.

 

full citation:

Goldberg D, Monroe J, Sempell P, Cheema J, Vunnam S, Kitsantas P

Resilience and Stress Among Health Care Workers Participating in the StressPal Frontline Program: Quasi-Experimental Pretest-Posttest Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e85388

URL: https://formative.jmir.org/2026/1/e85388

DOI: 10.2196/85388

 

StressPal Study Published in JMIR Formative Research

Research finds digital resilience training associated with reduced stress among healthcare workers

StressPal announced the publication of a study evaluating its StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Prevention program in JMIR Formative Research, an open access, peer-reviewed journal focused on emerging digital health innovations.

Read more

When Stress Filters Perception: Communication Can Go Sideways

Have you ever watched a team start to misfire and wondered, What happened?

The people are the same. The skills are still there. The commitment has not disappeared. The clinical expertise remains. And yet, somehow, misunderstandings are on the rise. Mistakes are happening.

Someone’s silence is interpreted as judgment. Someone’s urgency is interpreted as disrespect. Conversations feel more tense. A neutral comment lands as criticism. A brief response feels dismissive.

What’s happening?

Our brains are hardwired to perceive threat. And survive. Rapid fire, our senses are activated. We listen, look, touch, notice. In an instant, we interpret. We act — run, fight, get very quiet. These survival response strategies worked pretty well when it came to venomous snakes, leopards, and forest fires. Then wind down by the campfire with our tribe. Assuming we survived.

In the world most of us inhabit today, the stressors are of an entirely different nature. Exhaustion and psychological stressors are many. How will I get all of this work done? Will there be enough money to pay the bills? Are my children really okay? Is our country falling apart? The list goes on, as we all well know from our lived experience.

With a brain working at warp speed to process the next threat we perceive, under stress, we may not interpret the cues right every time. We can misread context, facial expressions, silence, timing, and intent.

The Same Team Can Function Very Differently Under Stress

In healthcare, we often look at team challenges through the lens of performance.

Did someone follow the process? Did the handoff happen? Was the patient updated? Was the task completed? Were the expectations clear?

Those questions matter. They are necessary. But they may not tell the whole story.

Under sustained pressure, the same team can produce very different outcomes. Not because the people have suddenly become less capable, but because stress changes how people process information and interpret each other.

A team that usually collaborates well may begin to feel guarded. A team that usually moves quickly and efficiently may begin to stumble over small misunderstandings. A team that normally gives each other the benefit of the doubt may start assuming negative intent.

That shift can be subtle at first.

No one comes in one day and says, “Our perception of each other has changed.” Instead, people start saying things like:

“She seemed annoyed.”

“He was short with me.”

“They don’t respect what we do.”

“I can’t say anything without someone getting defensive.”

“No one listens anymore.”

Sometimes these statements reflect real behavior that needs to be addressed. But sometimes they reflect the way our own stress response is filtering through the lens of all the large and small tense and difficult moments that we somehow survived — last time.

When people are under pressure, their attention narrows. Their nervous system scans for threat more quickly. They may hear irritation in a neutral tone or assume criticism where clarification was intended. They may interpret a delay, a facial expression, or a lack of warmth as evidence that something is wrong.

In other words, the facts of the interaction may be fairly simple. The meaning assigned to the interaction may be much more complicated.

And once meaning gets assigned, the human mind filters our further responses through that interpretation.

When Neutral Starts Feeling Negative

A manager, worried that he’ll get it wrong, asks a follow-up question — again — to clarify next steps. A team member hears, “You don’t trust me.”

A co-worker walks past a nurse without saying hello, absorbed in worries about her ailing parent. The anxious new hire thinks, “She didn’t say hello. She doesn’t like me.”

A nurse — who experienced a child dying last week — pauses before answering because she is thinking through the safest next step. The new resident interprets the pause as resistance.

None of these moments may be dramatic by themselves. But under pressure, small interpretations and misinterpretations accumulate. People start bracing for each other.

They become more careful, more guarded, or more reactive. They may stop asking questions because they do not want to “bother” anyone. They may avoid giving feedback because they expect defensiveness. They may pull back from collaboration because it no longer feels safe or easy.

This is one way good teams begin to misfire.

The problem is not always that someone said something clearly inappropriate. Sometimes the problem is that everyone is operating with less emotional margin. When that happens, neutral interactions can start to feel negative.

How This Shows Up Across Teams

Stress-triggered perception does not always look like open conflict. Sometimes it is quieter.

It may look like fewer questions being asked during handoffs. Less warmth between people who used to work well together. More side conversations. More assumptions. Less benefit of the doubt.

It may show up as disengagement.

People stop offering ideas. They stop volunteering. They do only what is required because participating more fully feels emotionally risky.

It may show up as conflict.

Small issues escalate quickly. People react to tone instead of content. Clarifying questions are interpreted as challenges. Feedback conversations become emotionally charged.

It may show up as turnover.

People may leave not because of one terrible event, but because the environment has started to feel tense, unpredictable, or personally draining. They may not even have language for what changed. They may simply say, “The culture is different now,” or “It’s not the same team anymore.”

And they may be right.

But the change may not have started with poor intentions or lack of professionalism. It may have started with a cascade of stress triggered reactions, one interaction at a time. 

Over time and hundreds of interactions, unhelpful patterns of response among co-workers may start to feel like the “way we do things here,” negatively impacting unit culture. That’s a big topic for another day.

A Different Question for Leaders

When teams are struggling, it is natural to ask, “Who is not performing?”

Sometimes that is the right question.

But there is another question worth asking at the same time:

Is this really a performance problem, or has the stress we are all experiencing changed how this team is hearing and communicating with one another?

That question creates more room for curiosity. It does not excuse harmful behavior. It does not ignore accountability. But it does help leaders look beneath the surface, and lead in a different way.

In health settings, leaders are making huddles and check-ins a regular practice. It gives an opportunity to clarify, to explore a transaction that resulted in disagreement, and to simply ask “Did I get that right”?

It’s a solid step forward, but for many people experiencing stress and distress in the workplace and at home, especially early career care team members, huddles won’t be enough.

Self-care agency — an acquired ability — essential for sustaining professional efficacy and reducing risk of burnout

That is where psychological flexibility becomes so important.

Psychological flexibility is the capacity to notice what is happening inside us, when we are triggered, and choose a response that is more workable, especially in difficult moments.

It’s a learned capacity, which can deteriorate under persistent stress, but with exposure to evidence-based cognitive defusion strategies, this capacity can strengthen. 

The science is well-established that the brain’s capacity to adapt, to be psychologically flexible, is protective of our resilience. Which in turn is protective against spiraling, negative stress responses, and burnout.

Good advice, and age-old tips about breathing and relaxing are not enough.

A number of studies have demonstrated that mindfulness-based approaches with nurses and clinicians resulted in lower stress and other positive change. We are glad to share citations with our readers on request.

Most healthcare workers do not have access to 1:1 or small group sessions with skilled clinicians, knowledgeable in leading methodologies (such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and others), to increase psychological flexibility and self-care our resilience. This is part of the access problem StressPal was designed to address.

StressPal offers a multi-media, digital intervention that’s confidential and easy for health organizations to implement. It’s grounded in leading process-based and mindfulness methodologies. In just minutes a day, participants acquire skills they can use immediately and return to over time. At an experiential level, what we are hearing from health professionals is that these changes, in turn, are resulting in positive changes in communication, pausing before reacting, and catching oneself sooner in patterned stress behaviors that lead to overreacting. 

Across care teams nationally, 97% of participants report they feel better able to defuse stress-triggered responses and communicate more effectively with others.  It goes without saying that better communication, team-building, and patient care are supported by arming ourselves with the competencies we need to mindfully self-care our foundational resilience, as well as our physical well-being.

Because the goal is not simply to be calmer. We also want to stay connected, effective, and aligned with the values that brought us into the work in the first place.

If you are a healthcare leader noticing more tension, withdrawal, or miscommunication on your teams, it may be worth asking not only what is happening, but how What has worked so far in arming your co-workers and teams with best practices strategies for resilience self-care? 

Connect with Pennie to learn more about how StressPal can support healthcare teams in building practical, science-grounded skills for resilience, communication, and values-aligned care.

 

Authored by Pennie Sempell, J.D, Co-founder and co-author of StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Intervention, an innovative professional development intervention specifically developed for healthcare and allied frontline workers.

© 2026 StressPal Inc. All rights reserved.

Just published in JMIR Formative Research

July 9, 2026 – “Resilience and Stress Among Health Care Workers Participating in the StressPal Frontline Program: Quasi-Experimental Pretest-Posttest Study”  LINK to journal

A Different Lens on Avoidance in Care Teams

 

In healthcare, not every issue gets addressed in the moment.

Sometimes there simply isn’t enough time. A shift is moving fast. Patients need attention. Staffing is tight. Another priority takes over. A difficult conversation gets pushed aside because everyone is trying to get through the day.

What else may be going on?

Over time, what starts as a practical response can become a pattern. Issues fall through the cracks. Tension goes unnamed. Follow-through becomes inconsistent. Conversations that need to happen are delayed again and again.

Avoiding a problem can feel like the safest way out of a tight situation. But in care teams, avoidance often creates downstream operational and relational problems that are much harder to resolve later.

Over 60% of StressPal Frontline participants report that a common stress-triggered behavior they are seeing in coworkers is avoidance.

That matters.

In high-pressure environments, avoidance may be an unhelpful stress response. When the stress response kicks in, people may move into fight, flight, or freeze. Avoidance often fits into that “flight” response. It’s a way to get distance from internal discomfort, conflict, uncertainty, or emotional overload.

Avoidance isn’t always obvious. It may not look like someone refusing to do their job or ignoring a serious problem. More often, it shows up in smaller ways.

  • A task that triggers uncomfortable memories is put off. And left undone.
  • A concern is noticed but not raised, lest it stir up more conflict.
  • A difficult conversation is postponed until “things calm down”, but do they ever calm down enough?
  • A leader senses something is off but moves on because there are already too many fires to put out, and at the same time is anxious about it causing delays in picking her son up on time. Again.

One problem is that avoiding the uncomfortable internal experience doesn’t usually make the issue disappear.

It can move the cost somewhere else.

A missed conversation may become a patient safety concern. A repeated pattern may become a team norm. A small misunderstanding may become resentment. A lack of follow-through may become distrust. A leader’s silence may be interpreted as approval, indifference, or lack of support.

Over time, avoidance changes the emotional climate of a unit. The same can be said for a slew of other maladaptive stress-triggered behaviors, like sarcasm and defensiveness.

People begin to fill in the blanks. They make assumptions about intent. They stop bringing things forward. They protect themselves by disengaging. The team may still function, but with more friction, less trust, and less psychological safety.

Stress isn’t just something people carry internally. It shows up in body language, micro-expressions, tone of voice. They reflect our inner experience, and influence how leaders and co-workers interact.

The good news is that avoidance isn’t a character flaw. It’s a brain-based response that can be noticed, self-assessed, and changed.

With brief, structured training, teams can learn to pause earlier, recognize stress responses in real time, and choose a different action before unhelpful behaviors become the default. That kind of psychological flexibility can help people stay connected to their values, even when the environment is demanding.

This doesn’t mean every issue needs to be addressed immediately. Timing matters. Capacity matters. But it does mean teams benefit from brief training to proactively acquire cognitive strategies of psychological flexibility and applying them at work, and home.

Avoidance may feel like relief in the moment, but the cost is often paid later by the team, the leader, and sometimes the patient.

Where might avoidance be a factor in what’s hanging up communication and resolution of an issue in your team?

 

Authored by Pennie Sempell, J.D, Co-founder and co-author of StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Intervention, an innovative professional development intervention specifically developed for healthcare and allied frontline workers.

© 2026 StressPal Inc. All rights reserved.

 

When communication breaks down in high-stress healthcare environments (2-minute read)

Pennie Sempell, J.D., Cofounder at StressPal

How many times have you been on a communication roller coaster that went off the rails? I recall a time when I was leading a conflict resolution session with two health providers, who had worked together for years, but they weren’t really hearing each other anymore. They’d been the best of friends, Godparents for each other’s children. Barbeques on the weekend.

Over the years, the financial, regulatory and sheer volume of work strained them both. Terry’s tendency to snap back and Jason’s pattern of blaming were a toxic combination that made effective communication nearly impossible anymore. There were no more barbeques together. Sparks were flying nonetheless.

It’s easy to call this a communication issue, but what’s happening underneath is something else.

 

We’re Told to Communicate Better. But That’s Not the Problem.

In healthcare, “communicate better” is one of the most common recommendations. But what does that actually mean in a high-pressure environment? In real-world settings, it often feels disconnected from reality.

These two healthcare professionals came to me for help in patching their relationship. Telling them to “communicate better” would have accomplished nothing.

Care teams are moving quickly. Priorities are constantly shifting. Decisions are being made in real time, often with incomplete information. There’s very little margin to pause and think about how something is being said or how it might be received.

So communication becomes compressed. Not because people don’t care, but because the environment demands speed. Compressed communication, together with stress behaviors, opens the door to misunderstanding.  People feel it, even if they can’t always name it.

 

This Isn’t a Communication Problem. It’s a Stress Pattern.

We’ve been telling people to communicate better for years. If that worked, we wouldn’t still be seeing the same breakdowns across teams.

Under sustained pressure, communication changes, often in unexpected ways. Tone can feel sharper, even when that’s not the intention. Listening becomes more limited as attention is divided across multiple demands.

Since childhood, we’ve been reacting to stressors in our external world. We’ve watched our parents, classmates, and others when things got heated. Over time, we tend to lock in patterned behaviors—and under sustained stress, those responses can get pretty rigid. We surmise, “That’s the way I am when I am stressed out.” As if that’s the only option.

 

When Non-Verbal Signals Start Working Against Us

A significant portion of communication is non-verbal. In high-stress environments, these signals can easily be misinterpreted.

We’re reading the non-verbal cues that reflect the thoughts and feelings going on, but they’re not necessarily aligned with the words being said.

A neutral facial expression may be read as frustration. A brief response may feel dismissive. A lack of eye contact may be interpreted as disengagement.

We don’t always know the context. We may read it right, but we may not. These small moments accumulate. Teams that normally function well can begin to feel misaligned, even when no single interaction explains why.

 

The Shift from Connection to Task Completion

As pressure builds, attention narrows. The focus shifts toward getting through the work, which makes sense in a high-acuity environment.

At the same time, awareness of how interactions are landing begins to fade.

People are less likely to check in with each other. Emotional cues are easier to miss. Communication becomes more functional, but less relational. A sarcastic undertone. Eyes that roll. A raised voice. A huff. The shift may be subtle, but it’s where miscues grow.

 

What We’re Hearing from Healthcare Teams

What research tells us is that our stress patterns can change. There’s a term for it in psychology: psychological flexibility — the capacity to choose more workable responses, even in high-acuity moments. It’s foundational to resilience.

When healthcare workers are given evidence-based strategies to do exactly that, the shift happens quickly. After brief training, more than 90% of StressPal Frontline graduates report being more effective in communication, less stressed, and functioning better under pressure.

One clinician put it simply:

“There are a lot of things going on that I can’t control. But now I have tools I can use at work and at home to reduce stress and take better care of my patients.”

We often have limited control of stressors in our external environment, but we can learn cognitive strategies to retrain a resilient brain, aligned with what matters to us. What we value.

 

A Different Way to Think About It

What we’re seeing across healthcare environments is consistent. These patterns aren’t random. They’re predictable responses to sustained pressure.

And they’re not resolved by simply asking people to communicate more clearly or more frequently.

If we continue to treat this as a communication problem, we’ll continue to get the same results.

Because the issue isn’t just what’s being said. It’s what’s happening internally, in real time, under pressure. Recognizing this is an important first step.

 

A Quick Reflection

Where might communication feel more strained than it used to?

Are there moments where tone or intent is being misread?

What might your team be feeling, but not saying out loud?

 

 

© StressPal, Inc. 2026

Curb those stress behaviors and earn 12 CEUs while you are at it.

 

Nurses and advanced practice providers have been telling us about the many stress behaviors they commonly see in co-workers and themselves – like defensiveness, avoidance, micromanaging. We keep hearing them say they want to learn practical, actionable strategies to change how they react (or overreact) in high acuity situations, to lower their stress levels, and build resilience to live the life they value.

acpe accreditation logo

Ready to give your unit or department a validated, structured program to lower stress, strengthen resilience and boost team skills under pressure? We fill that gap. It’s so rewarding to be able to offer leaders and their unit exactly those tools. Self-paced tools that are being immediately applied by care teams.

Here’s the scoop on the credits side: Up to 12.0 professional CEs and 12.0 Interprofessional CEs – to healthcare workers, jointly with Postgraduate Institute for Medicine.

Check it out.

12.0 Physicians, AMA PRA Category 1

12.0 Nurses, American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)

12.0 Social workers, Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB)

12.0 Psychologists, American Psychological Association (APA)

12.0 Pharmacists, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)

Plus inter-professional skill building credits for all health works (all roles):

12.0 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE)

 

Here’s how it works: In bite-sized modules, in the flow of work, participants progress through the program at their own pace over 4-6 weeks, with ongoing support.  The StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Prevention intervention program is readily accessible on any device, and offers learners a secure learning platform with strict anonymity and confidentiality (nickname only on sign-up) and no sharing of learner data. At completion of the core training, learners can opt to directly connect to Postgraduate Institute for Medicine’s CME University, to access their account (or set one up), complete the evaluation form, and claim their credits.  Credits are included with the program, and no extra fees.

 

I’m easy to reach via our Contact page, and always glad to help.

 

Pennie Sempell

Cofounder, Program Director

pennie@stresspal.com

Optum NPs Engage in StressPal Frontline Study

Investigator Kristen Neimiller-Vega, FNP, has closed her doctoral dissertation study with about 140 nurse practitioners at Optum Health, who enrolled in the StressPal Frontline resilience intervention.  We were delighted to see enrollment oversubscribed on the first day it was announced, and to see such candid engagement in their dedicated peer community!  Completion rates are excellent, too, as NPs claim that big bundle of 12 <em>AMA PRA Category</em> 1 credits, and 12 ANCC contact hours, plus 12 Interprofessional CEs.

In their private community, learners anonymously posted about common stress-triggered behaviors that they see at work, such as sarcasm, avoidance and defensiveness. They spoke at length about the immediately applicable stress resilience strategies they learned, and the value of the program in their work and personal lives.

Kristen will be analyzing her data this coming month. Our team at StressPal looks forward to reading her manuscript, and seeing it published.  We will keep you posted!

Shaan Presenting

StressPal Research at APHA 2025

‘”If I don’t care for myself, my cup will be empty”: Exploring health professionals’ perception of benefits of attending online training for self-care and resilience.’ was presented at APHA 2025 by Shaan Muberry Khan, MPH, MS, a PhD student with the Department of Health Administration & Policy at George Mason University. Congratulations, Shaan, for your First Place award!

The presentation explored findings about self-care and stress resilience in nurses, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers and health administrators who participated the StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Prevention, program in a research led by George Mason University in partnership with StressPal.

This was an internal conference, arranged by the College of Public Health in Spring. This time more than 60 student-led posters were presented. The posters were judged by blinded faculty and guests and scored. The three-hour event ends with a mini-award giving ceremony for recognizing the top three posters from each group (undergrad/Master/PhD) and celebrating students’ achievements

Code You Logo

Code You & Stress Resilience for Nurses in Training

Nurses Phyllis Morton and Tamara Ramirez will bring their valuable coaching to young nurses at Schreiners University School of Nursing, where participants will interact in their own community on the StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Prevention platform, and have unlimited access to the training modules and stress relief resources.

The StressPal Frontline learning platform will provide the nurses and their coaches with the own private peer community, to anonymously participate and interact, and to upload their own wellness resources for their own cohort.

External stressors, workplace inefficiencies, lack of autonomy or recognition, financial pressure, how micro-aggressive behaviors are tolerated in the workplace, and individual vulnerabilities are all factors, among others, that influence our experience of stress and symptoms of burnout.

What the Morton/Ramirez team brings to the table is an integration of coaching, structured learning, and ongoing support to learn actionable skills and strategies to change stress behaviors, aligned with valued-actions. In this way, nurses gain awareness and practical skills to reduce their experience of stress and to strengthen their resilience.

We are excited to see this project unfolds!